How to Use McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y to Become a Better Leader [How-To Guide #022]
Use this to diagnose leadership beliefs and transform culture.
👋 Welcome to the FREE edition of our Leadership Guides newsletter. Every Saturday, we provide a practical guide to a complex leadership and management issue.
See all of our leadership guides here.
What Is McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y and Why It Matters
Origin: Douglas McGregor introduced this model in his 1960 book The Human Side of Enterprise, a foundational text in management theory. He challenged the prevailing command-and-control view of leadership and proposed two contrasting sets of assumptions that managers make about workers.
Core Idea: The way managers think about people—their assumptions—shapes how they lead, design systems, and make decisions. These assumptions fall into two distinct categories:
Theory X: Assumes people dislike work, avoid responsibility, and need close supervision.
Theory Y: Assumes people are motivated, seek responsibility, and can self-direct if given the right environment.
Why It Matters: Managers operating under Theory X assumptions create rigid, control-heavy environments that stifle engagement and innovation. Those who embrace Theory Y foster autonomy, trust, and creativity. The theory doesn't just describe people—it exposes how leadership beliefs shape culture and performance.
Use Case: A mid-sized engineering firm had high turnover in its design team. The CTO assumed designers needed constant oversight to meet deadlines (a Theory X mindset). After shifting to Theory Y—giving designers clearer goals, more autonomy, and input into project plans—productivity rose and attrition halved within six months.
Step-by-Step Guide: How to Apply Theory X and Theory Y Thinking
Step 1: Diagnose Your Default Beliefs
What to do: Reflect on your assumptions about team members.
How to do it: Ask yourself:
Do I believe most people only work hard if monitored?
Do I assume people avoid responsibility when possible?
Or do I trust that people want to do meaningful work and grow?
Who: All people managers.
Time needed: 30 minutes of guided reflection or facilitated session.
Tip: Do this anonymously with your leadership team to reveal cultural tendencies.
Step 2: Observe Where X and Y Show Up in Practice
What to do: Identify areas in your organisation where Theory X or Y dominates.
How to do it: Look at:
How performance is monitored
How decisions are made
How mistakes are treated
How targets and incentives are set
Who: Heads of HR, Ops, and People.
Time needed: 1–2 weeks of team observations, surveys, and process reviews.
Step 3: Surface the Consequences
What to do: Link these mindsets to real outcomes.
How to do it: Use qualitative and quantitative data to map:
Theory X environments → micromanagement, disengagement, attrition
Theory Y environments → trust, innovation, internal promotions
Who: People analytics or Chief of Staff.
Time needed: 1 week.
Example: Compare departments with high autonomy vs high control—look at productivity, turnover, and engagement data.
Step 4: Rewire Your Systems Around Theory Y
What to do: Shift key systems—goal setting, appraisal, hiring, team design—toward Theory Y principles.
How to do it:
Replace activity tracking with outcome-based goals
Let teams design their own workflows
Give autonomy over how work is done, even if what is fixed
Remove low-trust controls like mandatory check-ins or surveillance tools
Who: CEO, CHRO, functional heads.
Time needed: 2–3 months depending on scale.
Step 5: Coach Leaders to Shift Their Beliefs
What to do: Move beyond system design—change leadership behaviour.
How to do it:
Train leaders to ask questions, not give orders
Use peer feedback to identify controlling habits
Run retrospectives on team trust and autonomy
Who: L&D, internal coaches, external facilitators.
Time needed: Ongoing.
Tip: Introduce Theory X/Y in leadership development programmes as a diagnostic and development lens.
Pitfalls and Misapplications
Assuming Theory X is ‘bad’: It’s not always wrong. In high-risk, high-compliance environments (e.g. nuclear plants), a Theory X orientation may be appropriate.
Assuming you’re Theory Y by default: Many managers believe they empower others, but their systems and tone say otherwise.
Moving too fast: Shifting from Theory X to Y requires both structural and cultural change. Move in layers.
Confusing Theory Y with a lack of accountability: Autonomy doesn’t mean an absence of expectations. It means shifting from control to clarity.
Signs You’re Doing It Wrong
You’ve removed controls, but performance has dropped
Your team seems more confused than empowered
Managers give autonomy, then punish failure
Take Action: Apply It This Week
In your next 1:1, ask team members: “What part of your role do you feel micromanaged in?” Use their answer to spot a hidden Theory X dynamic.